Navigating the complexities of a child custody battle can be overwhelming, especially when considering the rights and wishes of your child. Arshad, Pangere & Warring, LLP, a well-established law firm working in family law and child custody, is here to provide clarity on this sensitive issue. Below, we explore a few factors that may influence whether a child can choose which parent to live with following a divorce. We provide a detailed look into your case at a consultation, so call for individualized advice.
Firstly, it’s crucial to understand the legal foundations of custody battles. In Indiana, where our family law firm is based, there are three types of custody: sole custody, joint legal custody, and joint physical custody. Legal custody refers to the right to make major decisions on behalf of the child, while physical custody pertains to the child’s living arrangements.
Courts may award physical custody to one parent (the custodial parent) and joint legal custody to both parents. The noncustodial parent is typically granted parenting time or visitation rights. The determination of custody arrangements takes into account various factors, including each parent’s wishes, the age of the child, the child’s relationship with each parent and other significant individuals, the child’s school and community life, patterns of domestic violence, and the physical and mental health of all parties involved.
But what about the child’s input? Can they decide where they wish to live, and how influential is their choice in a custody hearing? The answer to this question is complex and varies by jurisdiction. Some courts consider a child’s opinion if they are at least 14 years old, but the age range at which a child’s input may be considered can vary. However, it’s important to note that some courts may choose to ignore a child’s opinion even if they are mature enough to voice one.
Why might a court disregard a child’s preference? The court’s primary concern is the child’s best interest. If the court believes that the child’s preference is not in their best interest – for example, if the preferred parent lacks stability or has a history of violence – the court may rule otherwise. The chosen parent’s wishes may also impact the decision-making process. If the preferred parent does not wish for full custody, the court will need to consider alternative arrangements.
In conclusion, while a child’s preference can be considered in a custody battle, it is only one of many factors the court will weigh. The child’s best interest remains the guiding principle in all custody decisions.
Navigating a custody battle is a challenging process fraught with emotion. It’s vital to have knowledgeable legal representation on your side to guide you through the intricacies of the legal system. At Arshad, Pangere & Warring, we are committed to providing our clients with comprehensive, empathetic support during this difficult time. Contact us for a consultation regarding your child custody matters. Our team of seasoned lawyers is ready to fight for your rights and work towards the best possible outcome for you and your child.
We understand that life doesn’t always go the way you plan. That’s why we accept credit cards and offer payment plans.
* indicates required field
Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing certain contact information herein, you are expressly authorizing the recipient of this message to contact you via the methods of communication provided.